Where in Russia to live is good news. Chelyabinsk vs Yekaterinburg vs Omsk vs Novosibirsk

Let us immediately indicate that we are talking about Russian cities that are favorable for life from a variety of points of view: climate, ecology, housing affordability, and many others. And it is not experts who vote for the place of cities in the ranking, but people who buy real estate. Vote in rubles. But it is important not only where to buy, but also what to buy.

In most cities of Russia with a population of more than 250 thousand people, buying new buildings is more profitable than secondary housing. This conclusion was made by the experts of the portal Domofond.ru, who analyzed the cost of housing in the primary and secondary markets in 70 cities of Russia.

So, in February 2018, in 54 cities out of 70, a square meter of housing in new buildings was cheaper than in the secondary market. The biggest gap between prices for "second hand" and new apartments in Saratov, where a square meter in a new building is almost 25% cheaper than in the secondary market. In Vladimir a meter in a new building costs 23% less than in a secondary apartment. The third place in this ranking was taken by Tula with a difference of 19.8%, the fourth - Sevastopol(-19.7%), rounded out the top five Podolsk (-18 %).

And only in 16 cities out of 70 the cost per square meter in new buildings was higher than in the secondary market. Chita became the leader in terms of price difference: housing in a new house here costs an average of 22.4% more than in the secondary market. The second position in this rating was occupied by Grozny with a difference in the average price per square meter of 11.1% in favor of new buildings. The top 5 cities where new buildings cost more than secondary housing also include Astrakhan, Novokuznetsk: new buildings are more expensive than "secondary housing" by 10.9%, and Nizhny Tagil - by 9.2%. Moscow took the ninth line: in the capital, a square meter in new houses costs 3.5% more than in the secondary market.

Among millionaire cities, only in Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod and Perm, prices for new buildings are higher than for secondary housing. In Moscow - by 3.5%, in Nizhny Novgorod - by 2.4%, and in Perm - by a formal 0.3%. In other cities with a population of more than 1 million people, a square meter in a new building will cost less. This trend is most pronounced in Samara, where the average cost per square meter of new housing is 15.9% lower than the "secondary" ones. Buying an apartment in a new building looks especially profitable also in Rostov-on-Don (-12.5% ​​of the cost of the "secondary") and Krasnoyarsk (-12.1%).

In Novosibirsk, a square meter of housing on the secondary market, according to Domofond.ru, costs 62,402 rubles, in a new building - 58,039 rubles. The price difference is 7%.

Sea Sea

The Black Sea is our everything. In the sense that Russia, with all its vast area, has few coasts of warm seas. And people are drawn to the warmth and the sea for a long time. For example, in April, the World of Apartments portal caught a new trend: the interest of Russians in private houses in the Black Sea resorts grew by 28%.

Analysts also studied home ownership prices in the five most popular coastal cities of the Krasnodar Territory. During the year, houses in Russian resort towns near the Black Sea became more expensive by 1.6%. The average cost of a private house in the resort towns of the Krasnodar Territory amounted to 12 million rubles.

The most expensive houses are traditionally in Sochi: the average price of home ownership is 22.2 million rubles. Over the year, the average house in Sochi has risen in price by 2.4%. The second place belongs to Gelendzhik, where houses increased in price by 7.1% over the year. The average price here is 17.7 million rubles. In third place is Anapa, where housing is getting cheaper. Over the year, prices have fallen by 1.8%. The average cost of a private house in Anapa is 8.6 million rubles. Fourth place in Novorossiysk. RUB 6.6 million per house, which is 2.2% more expensive than a year earlier. In fifth place is Tuapse, where houses fell in price by 2.1%, to 4.6 million rubles.

Capital

Knight Frank analysts note that residents of the regions have begun to invest more actively in Moscow real estate: the number of residents of the regions who decided to invest in capital real estate with a budget of up to $10 million has grown from 10% to 26% over the year. Regional investors are interested in office, residential and retail real estate. Basically, these are people from Khabarovsk, Tyumen, Kazan, Rostov-on-Don, Ufa and St. Petersburg.

About 10% of investors want to co-invest in housing construction. Regional investors are interested in buying a home in order to rent it out later and receive a regular income. As for real estate under construction, the regions are also mainly interested in offices. As a rule, these are premises with an area of ​​100–400 m 2 in class A business centers. About 40% of transactions with private investors are concluded with the attraction of financing, 60% of clients invest only their own money in real estate.

Housing affordability

Housing prices in the regions of Russia vary significantly. CIAN analysts studied average housing prices and average monthly wages in major cities of Russia and calculated how many years it takes for an average family of two to save up for an apartment of 49 m 2 in a new building and 54 m 2 in the secondary market.

In eight cities out of the 47 largest in terms of population in the Russian Federation, an average family will need more than 3 years to save up for a new housing area of ​​49 m 2 in the primary market, in other cities this figure will be from 2 to 3 years. In the secondary market, the housing affordability index is more than 3 years old in 11% of cities.

Chelyabinsk topped the rating of Russia's large million-plus cities in terms of the housing affordability index in the primary market. In order to buy an apartment in a new building in the capital of the Chelyabinsk region, a local resident will need 2.1 years, in the secondary market this figure is slightly longer - 2.4 years. Here, the average monthly income of an employee in 2017 (38 thousand rubles) is almost comparable to the price of one square meter of housing in the primary market (39 thousand rubles / m2). In second place is Krasnoyarsk, where the housing affordability index was 2.2 years. In Novosibirsk, the affordability index was 2.6 and 3.3 years, respectively, in the primary and secondary markets.

Despite the fact that Moscow and St. Petersburg are leaders in terms of average income in 2017, residents of these cities will have to save for an apartment the longest - 4 and 3.7 years, respectively. Also, the housing affordability index was more than 3 years in Kazan (3.5), Nizhny Novgorod (3.1) and Ufa (3).

The average housing affordability index in million-plus cities for the primary market is 2.81, for the secondary market 3.31. Thus, housing in new buildings is 18% more affordable than in the secondary market.

Compared to 2013, the situation with the availability of housing in the primary market of Moscow has improved markedly. Four years ago, in order to buy an apartment in the capital of Russia, a potential buyer would have to save money for more than 4 years, and now the housing affordability index is 3.4 years. Such positive changes are due to the fact that nominal wages for the period under review grew faster than the price per square meter (+39% and +16% respectively). Similar trends are typical for most other regional centers.

When comparing the affordability index in the primary and secondary housing markets, the most significant differences are observed in Samara. When buying a home in the primary market, a local resident will have to save money for 2.4 years versus 3.3 years in the secondary market. First of all, such differences are due to the fact that the largest share of apartments in the primary market of Samara is concentrated in peripheral areas, and offers on the secondary market - in the central part of the city. The smallest differences were noted in Nizhny Novgorod, where the index was 3.1 and 3.3, respectively.

In Saratov, the housing affordability index is 2 years, which is one of the lowest values ​​among large Russian cities with a population of 400 to 1,000 thousand people. On the second position is Bryansk, where the index was 2.1 years. Residents of Lipetsk, Orenburg and Krasnodar will need the same number of years to save up for an apartment with an average area of ​​49 m 2 . The housing affordability index on the secondary market in these cities is also in the range of 2 to 3 years.

Most of the time will be required by potential buyers who want to acquire their own residential real estate in new buildings in large cities of Crimea. In Sevastopol - 5.3 years, Simferopol - 4.1 years. In the rating of the cost per square meter in the primary market of Russia, they are among the top ten, and the average monthly salary in them is 20–30% lower than in Russia as a whole. In the secondary market, the availability index is even higher - 6.6 and 5.1 years, respectively. Such indicators are associated with the attractiveness of this location, the focus of developers on buyers from other regions, as well as the consequence of the existence of the "dollar" market here in the Ukrainian period.

Vladivostok closes the top three - 3.5 years. In 2017, a high level of average monthly wages was noted here - 50 thousand rubles. At the same time, real estate prices are also quite high. Thus, in the ranking of the cost per square meter of housing in new buildings, the city ranks third after Moscow and St. Petersburg. The index of housing affordability exceeds 3 years in Ulan-Ude, the average cost per square meter of an apartment here exceeds the average monthly salary by 32%. Most of the new buildings in the city are at a high stage of construction and will be commissioned this year.

There are more places where life is bad in Russia than where it is good. The best in terms of quality of life in the country are the capital regions (Moscow, St. Petersburg, Moscow region), the situation is worse in Siberia and the Far East.

The quality of life index is calculated on the basis of Rosstat data on several indicators: the quality of housing conditions, the size and distribution of income, the migration attractiveness of the region, the survival rate of children under the age of one year, personal security, the development of service markets, life expectancy, and the availability of jobs. The index takes values ​​from 0 to 100 and has been calculated annually since 2003.

In the regional context, the best results in terms of quality of life in 2009 were shown by Moscow (the index here was 79.08), St. Petersburg (74.6) and the Moscow Region (71.06). It is difficult to surprise anyone with these results. In general, the top ten regions where it is best to live have changed “over the past years insignificantly: by their nature, indicators of the quality of life are not subject to drastic changes,” the researchers note.

After the capital regions, the top 10 included Belgorod Region (70.61), Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug (70.49), Krasnodar Territory (69.41) and Tyumen Region (68.78), Tatarstan (68.73) , Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug (68.55) and Lipetsk Region (67.14).

But the worst regions for life in the country were the republics of Tyva (47.55), Altai (53.83), Kalmykia (55.52), Buryatia (55.63), the Jewish Autonomous Region (56.67), as well as the Amur region (57.22), Trans-Baikal Territory (57.25), Ingushetia (57.37), Irkutsk (57.42) and Kurgan (57.7) regions.

In addition to the current results in assessing the development of regions, dynamics are also important. So, the regions where the quality of life is growing the fastest are: the Sakhalin region, Ingushetia, Dagestan, the Kaliningrad region, the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, the republics of Tyva, Khakassia, the Tyumen region, Kabardino-Balkaria and the Kurgan region.

The worst dynamics was shown by the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Sakha (Yakutia), Samara Region, Republic of Kalmykia, North Ossetia, Kemerovo Region, Khabarovsk Territory, Magadan, Nizhny Novgorod and Novgorod Regions

“However, the combination of the dynamic and static picture of the development of Russian territories is of the greatest interest,” the researchers are sure. Therefore, they identified four types of regions. The first includes the subjects of the Russian Federation, where the dynamics and the level of quality of life are lower than the national ones (the so-called “risk group”). The second type is regions where the level of quality of life is lower, but the dynamics is better than the national one. The third group includes regions where the level of quality of life is higher, and the dynamics is worse than the national one. And, finally, the "success group" included those territories where both the dynamics and the level of quality of life are above the national average.

As many as 23 regions of Russia turned out to be in the problematic risk group, which included even the Leningrad Region. It got into it (regions are located depending on the indicators from worst to best): Kalmykia, Amur, Irkutsk regions, Mari El, Perm Territory, Sakha (Yakutia), Astrakhan Region, Komi Republic, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Smolensk, Magadan Regions, Udmurtia, Novgorod Region, Karelia, Kemerovo Region, Khabarovsk Territory, Nizhny Novgorod, Bryansk, Vladimir Regions, Chuvashia, Volgograd, Ulyanovsk, Leningrad Regions.

The researchers included 17 constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the group of success, and Moscow was not included in it. Including (from best to worst): St. Petersburg, Moscow and Belgorod regions, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Krasnodar Territory, Tyumen Region, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Tula Region, Stavropol Territory, Kaliningrad Region, Adygea, Voronezh, Tambov, Sverdlovsk , Kaluga and Ryazan regions.

In the second group of "catching up development", where the level of quality of life is lower, the dynamics is better than the national one, there were 36 regions. In the third group - 6 regions.

I now live in Saratov, but I don't like it here. I have a choice of where to go. Moscow and St. Petersburg fall away immediately, for one simple reason. With the money that I get from selling an apartment in these cities, it will be problematic to buy normal housing.

It is logical to choose from the “success group”. Although I was in a couple of cities in Tatarstan and was in Oktyabrsky (Bashkortostan), and to be honest, they made very pleasant impressions, but I don’t consider them as a permanent place of residence. Perhaps these are subjective reasons, but I'm not drawn there.

Climatic conditions. I lived most of my life in Central Asia, got used to the heat and the sun, so that I won’t wait for me in the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug :-). For the same reason, we cross out the Tyumen and Sverdlovsk regions.

Remain Belgorod, Krasnodar Territory (here we include Adygea), Tula, Kaliningrad, Voronezh, Tambov, Kaluga and Ryazan. I have not been to any of these regions (except in transit). I will also exclude Stavropol from the potential list, according to reviews, a large village, and the Caucasus is nearby (after all, it is not a stable region).

According to my subjective criteria, the list of attractiveness for me looks like this:

1. Kaliningrad - it seems like Europe and the climate is mild, and my sister and niece live in Germany, it seems like it’s not far to go to each other.

2. Krasnodar - the climate is good, and the sea is close.

3. Belgorod - good reviews, the governor seems to be smart there. A friend moved there, so that I can still make inquiries with him.

4. Tula, Voronezh, Tambov, Kaluga and Ryazan. Plus Yaroslavl, although he is not on the list of the “group of success”, he decided to include him in his list of candidates (I don’t even know why).

The topic of the program is called where it is good to live in Russia, but there is more about the mobility of Russians, why, unlike the Americans, they are so hard to lift. It is very interesting to listen, especially to Natalya Zubarevich, a professor at Moscow State University. She is the only one who adequately and sensibly speaks and explains her position.

The rating of Russian regions in terms of quality of life for 2016 was prepared by the RIA Rating agency (as part of the Russia Today media group). The next version of the ranking of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation on the topic “where is it better to live today in Russia” has been prepared for the International Investment Forum in Sochi, which will be held on February 26-28.

In the top ten leaders, compared to the results of 2015, the changes are minimal: as before, the first three lines are occupied by Moscow, St. Petersburg and the Moscow Region, followed by the Republic of Tatarstan, Krasnodar Territory, Belgorod Region, Voronezh Region, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous District Lipetsk and Tyumen regions.

There were also no significant changes in the top ten regions. Outsiders in terms of quality of life are the Republic of Tuva, higher in the TOP of anti-leaders are Ingushetia, then Kalmykia, the Republic of Altai, the Jewish Autonomous Region, Transbaikalia, Karachay-Cherkessia, Kurgan Region, Chukotka and Buryatia.

The authors note that the last ten in 2016 was left by the Republic of Crimea, which rose by 10 positions and now occupies 66th place. The rapid rise of Sevastopol also draws attention - from 79th place to 29th place. The compilers of the rating explain this by the fact that “the dynamic growth of many economic indicators in 2016 had a positive impact on the quality of life in this city.”

It is clarified that the rating of regions in terms of quality of life is based on a set of indicators that take into account the state of certain aspects of life and the situation in the social sphere. 72 indicators were selected, which were combined into 11 groups characterizing all the main aspects of living conditions in the region - from the level of economic development and income of the population to the provision of the population with various types of services and climate.

At the end of 2016, the Vladimir region in the quality of life rating rose from 39th to 34th place. The compilers do not comment on the increase of five positions in region-33.

The geographical neighbors of the Vladimir region have the following situation. The Ryazan region rose the most in the ranking - it was in 27th place, and took 20th position, the Nizhny Novgorod region - was 12th, and became 14th.

Negative dynamics in the Ivanovo region - it fell from 42nd place to 46th line, and in the Yaroslavl region - it is in 27th place, minus 1 position.

According to the authors of the rating of Russian regions in terms of quality of life, one should not expect radical changes in 2017: the leaders of the rating are unlikely to give up their positions, and outsiders are unlikely to show significant growth. However, minor changes are possible. The most significant redistribution of places can occur in the middle part of the ranking, especially in regions whose economy is highly dependent on economic fluctuations.

Many of our compatriots are thinking about where they can move to live within the country. Ratings that show the advantages and disadvantages of individual cities can help them make a choice. How are they composed? What is taken into account? Which cities in Russia occupy the top lines of ratings in certain categories?

Features of cities and regions of Russia

Ecological, climatic and economic conditions in different parts of our country differ markedly. How to determine which Russian cities and regions are favorable for moving to a permanent place of residence? Based on public opinion polls and statistical data, ratings are compiled that should help to understand this issue. Many mass media are engaged in such research, but the ratings compiled by organizations such as the Department of Sociology of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation and the Center for Strategic Studies of the Rosgosstrakh company enjoy the greatest authority. The data source is the Federal State Statistics Service. There are many criteria by which the situation in each city and region is assessed.

Where to move to live better if the environmental factor is important to you

Human health is largely dependent on the state of the environment. Toxic waste that pollutes the air, water and soil can cause serious illness and even premature death. The presence of environmental problems is especially dangerous for pregnant women and children. Various congenital pathologies are the result of exposure to toxic emissions on the human body.

There are three factors that determine the state of the environment:

• industrial waste;
• vehicle exhaust gases;
• geographic location.

Enterprises in industrial cities and a large number of vehicles in metropolitan areas are the main sources of pollution. In addition, the concentration of toxic substances depends on the geographical location. If the city is located between hills, air currents do not blow its territory well enough. In this case, the concentration of harmful emissions increases many times over.

1. Pskov;
2. Smolensk;
3. Murmansk;
4. Nizhnevartovsk;
5. Sochi.

The air is fresh, the city is small and therefore not very polluted. If you are tired of the bustle of the city, gases and cars, then I suggest a trip to Pskov.

http://otzovik.com/review_2344826.html

The purity of the atmosphere in this city is maintained thanks to the coniferous forests located around it. Another positive factor is the abundance of green spaces in the park areas of Pskov.

It is also worth paying attention to the opposite rating, which determines the most environmentally polluted cities in Russia. When choosing a place for permanent residence, it is important to know in which cities the difficult environmental situation poses the greatest risk to health. The environmental anti-rating looks like this:

1. Norilsk;
2. Moscow;
3. St. Petersburg;
4. Cherepovets (Vologda region);
5. Asbest (Sverdlovsk region).

It is easy to see that this list includes metropolitan areas and cities in which large industrial enterprises are located. For example, the Severstal metallurgical plant is located in Cherepovets.

Medical service

An integral part of a fulfilling life is the opportunity to receive quality medical services. Life expectancy directly depends on this factor. The assessment of the level of medical care is based on surveys of residents: how satisfied they are with the availability and professionalism of treatment. As additional indicators, the death rate among people of retirement age and the percentage of people with incomes below the average who seek paid medical services are used. Rating of Russian cities with the highest level of healthcare:

1. Moscow;
2. St. Petersburg;
3. Naberezhnye Chelny;
4. Tyumen.

It is important to remember that cardiac problems are a common cause of disability and premature death. Timely diagnosis and highly professional treatment can stop the development of cardiovascular diseases. People suffering from such ailments should pay attention to the presence of cardiological clinics in the city or region to which they plan to move. These medical institutions must meet modern standards. A large number of clinics providing high-quality treatment for vascular and heart diseases are concentrated in Moscow, however, there are high-tech cardio centers in other Russian cities. For example, the Tyumen Cardiology Research Center, the Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulatory Pathology named after academician E.N. Meshalkin and the Research Institute of Cardiology named after V.A. Almazov in St. Petersburg.

Standard of living

In Russia, Moscow and the regions of Siberia and the Far East, where there are large oil and gas fields, are leading in terms of income. The rest of the Russian regions are far behind the leaders. This trend has continued for many years. Rating of the average monthly income of working citizens in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in 2018:

1. Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug (73091.7 rubles);
2. Moscow (70220.8 rubles);
3. Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug (64097.55 rubles);
4. Nenets Autonomous Okrug (61592.85 rubles);
5. Chukotka Autonomous Okrug (58063.5 rubles).

It is worth noting that in regions rich in hydrocarbon reserves, not only workers in the oil and gas industry receive high wages. For example, in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, which occupies the first line of the rating, the average monthly income of a school teacher is about 60 thousand rubles.

The leaders of the all-Russian list simultaneously top the income level ratings in the Central, Urals, Northwestern and Far Eastern federal districts. To complete the picture, it is worth comparing the average earnings of residents by federal districts:

1. Central Federal District (45312.3 rubles);
2. Northwestern, Urals, Far Eastern federal districts (40530.6 rubles);
3. Siberian Federal District (31081.05 rubles);
4. Southern, Privolzhsky federal districts (25957.8 rubles).

The average wage characterizes only one aspect of the standard of living. Another important aspect that should not be overlooked is the cost of living and the price level. Such an indicator as the affordability of housing will help to understand this issue. Rating of cities with the highest price of 1 square meter of housing:

1. Moscow (202269 rubles);
2. St. Petersburg (110114 rubles);
3. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk (104319 rubles);
4. Vladivostok (97576 rubles);
5. Sochi (95467 rubles).

For comparison, you should familiarize yourself with the list of cities with the lowest cost of 1 square meter of housing:

1. Nizhnekamsk (33501 rubles);
2. Novokuznetsk (33935 rubles);
3. Biysk (34558 rubles);
4. Rybinsk (36470 rubles);
5. Cherepovets (36806 rubles).

Settlements with affordable housing prices are mainly located in the Volga region, the Southern Urals and the Siberian Federal District.

Climate

What climatic conditions are considered the most favorable for human health and life? Positive factors include minor day-to-day fluctuations in air temperature and the absence of sudden changes in atmospheric pressure. To strengthen the immune system, the human body needs to receive a lot of ultraviolet radiation, this is especially important for children. Therefore, a large number of sunny days a year has a positive impact on human health.

Taking into account the above criteria, the most comfortable climatic zones for living are the Azov, Black Sea and Caspian coasts. The following cities are located in these zones:

• Krasnodar;
• Sevastopol;
• Novorossiysk;
• Astrakhan;
• Sochi.

Have you ever been to Sochi?! A wonderful place. Half a year summer, half a year off-season - green winter. I moved three years ago from Siberia. The climate is excellent, humid and hot for a maximum of two weeks in August.

Guest

http://www.woman.ru/rest/medley8/thread/4534455/

Weather-dependent people should carefully approach the choice of a region for permanent residence. Their well-being is deteriorating not only from magnetic storms. It is affected by sudden changes in air temperature and atmospheric pressure. Daily temperature fluctuations up to 1–2 ° C are considered safe for people suffering from meteorological dependence. In the regions listed above, this indicator is kept within these limits.

Employment

For people of working age, the prospect of getting a job in the city chosen for moving is of critical importance. The employment potential of a city or region can be analyzed using several indicators. First of all, you need to find out what kind of competition exists in the local labor market. The number of applicants per vacancy is an indicator showing how intense the competition among job applicants is. You should also take into account the number of unemployed people in a given city and the percentage of its residents who want to move to another region for the purpose of employment. All these criteria together will help determine how attractive and promising a given city is for migrants seeking work.

1. Ryazan;
2. Vologda;
3. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk;
4. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky;
5. Vladivostok.

The best cities to live in Russia

If you are planning to move to a new place of residence for the long term or permanently, it is wise to opt for a sustainable and promising city. Many Russian cities have serious development potential and show promise for the future.

Kazan

This city of the Volga region is one of the largest tourist centers in Russia. It attracts about a million tourists every year. The industry of the city includes large chemical and aviation enterprises. Kazan is the leader in terms of housing construction in the Volga region.

Krasnoyarsk

The largest economic, educational and sports center of Central and Eastern Siberia. Multiple winner of the competition "The most comfortable city in Russia". One of the most attractive Russian cities for investment. The leading branches of Krasnoyarsk's economy are non-ferrous metallurgy and mechanical engineering. The population is growing constantly and at a rapid pace.

Krasnodar

The capital of the most economically powerful region in southern Russia. Krasnodar has repeatedly topped the ratings of the most favorable Russian cities for doing business. The industrial potential of the region successfully attracts domestic and foreign investors. The industrial complex of Krasnodar consists of many enterprises that employ about a third of the working population. In addition, Krasnodar is an important transport hub.

Video: Krasnodar is one of the most promising cities in Russia

Novosibirsk

The Trans-Siberian Railway passes through Novosibirsk. This city has the largest logistics complex in Siberia. Its economy has a number of important advantages: a diversified industry, the development of the service sector, transport, logistics and science, the presence of a large number of small and medium-sized businesses. The population of Novosibirsk is growing thanks to migrants from other Russian regions and CIS countries.

Crime level

The complex criminal situation makes the city unattractive for migrants, even if it boasts high rates by other criteria. The desire to live in a safe place where there is little chance of becoming a victim of criminals often outweighs other arguments in favor of choosing one or another locality. There is a simple way to assess the level of crime - statistics on the number of crimes committed per 1,000 inhabitants. The safest cities in Russia according to this criterion:

1. Ryazan (7.8);
2. Ulyanovsk (11.3);
3. Voronezh (11.5);
4. St. Petersburg (12.0);
5. Penza (12.9).

It is also worth paying attention to the sad list of the most criminal cities in the Russian Federation. Comparison of a positive rating with a negative one shows how much the crime rate differs in different cities and regions.

1. Kemerovo (32.2);
2. Kurgan (31.9);
3. Tyumen (30.7);
4. Nizhny Novgorod (27.7);
5. Samara (24.3).

Child Development

When choosing a permanent place of residence, families with children should give preference to environmentally friendly cities with a high quality of medical care. It is also worth asking about the availability of educational, sports and entertainment facilities. Cities that have a large number of such institutions and create conditions for the comprehensive development and education of children:

1. Kazan;
2. Belgorod;
3. Rostov-on-Don;
4. Kaliningrad;
5. Voronezh.

In the case of moving with small children, it is advisable to avoid sudden changes in climate. If the climatic conditions at the new place of residence and the previous one are not too different, it will be easier for the child's body to endure the move.

prestige

Undoubtedly, the most prestigious city in Russia is its capital. Many Russians aspire to Moscow, hoping to realize their potential there. But it must be taken into account that other large Russian millionaire cities are gradually developing, improving and today they are not much inferior to Moscow. Among them, it is worth highlighting St. Petersburg, which is often called the cultural capital of Russia.

It is impossible to single out one city or region that meets all the requirements at the same time. For example, a city with a high level of average monthly wages may be environmentally unfavorable, so the choice of each migrant depends on personal preferences and life circumstances.