71 points in the Russian exam. How many points do you need to score on the exam in the Russian language? Language Compliance

The distribution of USE scores 2018 for tasks in the Russian language can be found in demo version in the section "The system for assessing the examination paper in the Russian language"

Table of distribution of USE scores 2018 by assignments - Russian

The examination paper consists of two parts containing 26 tasks.

Part 1 contains 25 tasks, part 2 contains 1 task.

3.5 hours (210 minutes) are allotted to complete the examination paper in the Russian language.

The answers to tasks 1–25 are a number (number) or a word (several words), a sequence of numbers (numbers).

Assessment system for examination work in the Russian language

Part 1 For the correct completion of tasks 2–6, 8–14, 16–24, the examinee receives 1 point each. For an incorrect answer or its absence, 0 points are set. For completing tasks 1 and 15, from 0 to 2 points can be set.

The answer is considered correct if it contains all the numbers from the standard and there are no other numbers. 1 point is given if: one of the numbers indicated in the answer does not correspond to the standard; one of the digits specified in the answer template is missing. In all other cases, 0 points are given.

Task 7 can be assigned from 0 to 5 points. Task 25 can be assigned from 0 to 4 points. The answer is considered correct if it contains all the numbers from the standard and there are no other numbers.

For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the number from the list, the examinee receives 1 point.

Part 2

The maximum number of points for the entire written work (K1-K12) - 24

Many graduates ask how many points they need to score on the exam in a particular subject. The Russian language, like mathematics, is usually of the greatest interest.

Minimum score

It should be noted that the Russian language is a compulsory subject for the USE. Successfully overcoming the minimum level allows you to get a certificate of secondary general education. The mark "2" is given for the result from 0 to 35 points. In this case, the exam is considered failed. The test in a compulsory subject can be retaken on special reserve days (but it can only be Russian or mathematics - re-passing the test in both subjects in one year is not allowed). If the additional exam was also failed, the student has the right to retake only the next year. Thus, in order to pass the exam in the Russian language the first time, you need to score at least 36 points.

How many points do triples, good students and excellent students need?

If in the Russian language there is a five in the certificate, you should not worry about the fact that the grade can be lowered by the USE. USE results no longer have an impact on final school grades. Nevertheless, there is a scale for translating test results into the usual five-point system:

0–35 - two;
36–57 - three;
58–71 - four;
72 and above - five.

Thus, if your result is equal to at least 72 points, then consider that it corresponds to an excellent certificate. If you score, for example, 65 points, that is, get a four, this will not be reflected in the grade in the certificate. The result will be indicated only in a special certificate of passing the exam.

How many points do you need to get into college?

For the majority of USE graduates, not only the main exam, which allows you to get a certificate of secondary education, but also an entrance test to a higher educational institution. It is difficult to say how many points in the Russian language you need to score to enter the university. It all depends on the number of budget places, the prestige of the educational institution, the competition, etc. In addition, today, when entering universities, the sum of points for all entrance tests is taken into account. Thus, their exact number is important for any direction where the Russian language is needed for admission.

Whether such a system is good or not is difficult to determine. On the one hand, it obliges to prepare equally intensively in all subjects, on the other hand, it gives a chance even if the scores in the main discipline are not equal to 100. foreign languages, literature and an additional creative entrance test), each of which was evaluated on a 100-point scale. The end result, on the basis of which the enrollment took place, was the sum of the points scored in each subject.

Below are the criteria for evaluating an essay (essay) at the Unified State Examination in the Russian language for 2020. In the new Russian language demos 2020 evaluation criteria have been changed K2 And K4.

What can give the most points:

• 5 points - for a comment on the source text problem - K2
• 3 points - for literacy: spelling (K7) and punctuation (K8)

Arguing your own opinion on the problem - REMOVED in 2019!

Maximum for writing you can get 24 points.

Criteria for evaluating the answer to task 27

K1 Statement of source text problems

• 1 point The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.
• 0 points. The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text. *If the examinee did not formulate or formulated incorrectly (in one form or another in any part of the essay) one of the problems of the source text, then such a work according to the criteria K1-K4 is estimated at 0 points

K2 Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text

• 5 points. 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem. An explanation is given for the 2 given examples. The semantic connection between them is revealed. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment.
• 4 points. The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee brought at least 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem. An explanation is given for the 2 examples given, But there is no meaningful relationship between them,
  or the semantic connection between the examples was revealed, But only one example is explained. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment
• 3 points. The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee brought at least 2 illustration examples But an explanation is given for only one example, the semantic connection between the examples is not revealed, or the examinee brought 1 illustration example from the read text, important for understanding the problem, and gave an explanation to it, or led 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem, but did not explain their meaning. The semantic connection between examples-illustrations is indicated.
  There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment.
• 2 points. Examinee led 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem, But did not explain their meaning. The semantic connection between the examples-illustrations was not revealed.
• 1 point Examinee led 1 illustration example from the read text, important for understanding the problem, but did not explain its meaning.
• 0 points. Examples-illustrations from the read text that are important for understanding the problem are not given, or the problem is commented without relying on the source text, or the comment contains factual errors (one or more) related to the understanding of the source text, or commented on another problem not formulated by the examiner, or instead of a comment, a simple retelling of the text is given, or instead of a comment, a large fragment of the source text is quoted.

K3 Reflection of the position of the author of the original text

• 1 point The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no actual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.
• 0 points. The position of the author of the original text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the original text is not formulated.

K4 Attitude to the position of the author on the problem of the source text

• 1 point The examinee expressed his attitude to the position of the author of the text on the problem (agreeing or disagreeing with the author) and substantiated it.
• 0 points. The examinee did not express his attitude to the position of the author of the text, or the examinee's thoughts do not correspond to the formulated problem, or the examinee's opinion is stated only formally (for example, "I agree / disagree with the author")

II. Speech design of the essay

K5 Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation

• 2 points. The examinee's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
• 1 point The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, But 1 logical error was made, and/or there is 1 violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
• 0 points. In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, But more than 1 logical error was made, and/or There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text.

K6 Accuracy and expressiveness of speech

• 2 points. The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. * The candidate receives the highest score for this criterion only if highest mark received according to criterion K10.
• 1 point The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, But the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, But there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought.
• 0 points. The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.

III. Literacy

K7 Compliance with spelling rules

• 3 points. There are no spelling errors (or 1 minor error).
• 2 points. Made 1-2 mistakes.
• 1 point 3-4 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. More than 4 mistakes were made.

K8 Compliance with punctuation rules

• 3 points. There are no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error).
• 2 points. 1–3 mistakes made
• 1 point 4-5 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. 6 or more errors were made.

K9 Language Compliance

• 2 points. There are no grammatical errors.
• 1 point 1-2 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. 3 or more errors were made.

K10 Compliance with speech norms

• 2 points. No more than 1 speech error allowed.
• 1 point Made 2-3 mistakes.
• 0 points. 4 or more errors were made.

K11 Ethical Compliance

• 1 point There are no ethical errors in the work.
• 0 points. Ethical errors made (1 or more).

K12 Maintain factual accuracy in background material

• 1 point There are no actual errors in the background material.
• 0 points. There are factual errors (1 or more) in the background material.

Maximum amount points for the entire written work (K1–K12) - 24 points.

• When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account.When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words.
• The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words. If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 26 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.
• If in an essay less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are evaluated, the task is considered unfulfilled.
• When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:

• K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
• K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made).

1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:

• K7 - no more than two errors were made;
• K8 - one or three mistakes were made;
• K9 - grammatical errors No;
• K10 - no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to the K7–K12 criteria is not given for a work of 70 to 150 words.

• If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is rated 0 points.
• If the work, which is a rewritten or paraphrased source text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.

Solve in Russian

In the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are evaluated, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are an essay on the text. Today, in test tasks, it is necessary either to write down the words correctly (and not just find them), or to find two correct answers from the proposed ones (tasks 1 and 15), or to name the numbers indicating the correct setting of commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where you need to correlate erroneous sentences with the rules according to which errors were made.

Criteria for evaluating an essay

When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are scored, the task is considered failed.

When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words).
If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.

When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made).

1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two errors were made;
K8 - one or three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to the K7–K12 criteria is not given for a work of 70 to 150 words.

If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is estimated at 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or paraphrased source text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting the state final certification for educational programs secondary general education (Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205) “61. According to the results of the first and second checks, the experts, independently of each other, set points for each answer to the tasks of the examination USE work with a detailed answer... 62. In case of a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third test is scheduled. A significant discrepancy in scores is determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject. The expert who carries out the third check is provided with information about the scores given by the experts who previously checked the examination paper.
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more primary points between the sums of points given by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment items for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.

Document punctuation has been preserved.

When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay 1 should be taken into account.

1. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words 2 .

2. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are assessed, the task is considered failed.

When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7-K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made). 1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two errors were made;
K8 - one - three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to the K7-K12 criteria for a work of 70 to 150 words is not set.

If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is estimated at 0 points.

If a work that is a rewritten or paraphrased source text contains fragments of text
examiner, then the test takes into account only the number of words that belong to the examinee.

A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.

1 When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account.
Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two
words).
2 If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 03, 2014 No. 31205)
“61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the USE examination paper with a detailed answer ...
62. In the event of a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third test is scheduled. A significant discrepancy in scores is determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject.
The expert who carries out the third check is provided with information about the scores given by the experts who previously checked the examination paper.