What was Tsar Peter 1 like? Let's ask ourselves an unexpected question: was Peter I a Russian? Visual similarity, no other evidence needed

CRITICISM OF THE VERSION ABOUT THE SUBSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN TSAR PETER THE GREAT FOR HIS DOUBLE

Now in the global network, called the Internet, a lot of materials on past history have appeared, which challenge the established point of view and offer new versions of certain events. Since history is a human matter, it could not be compiled without the influence of certain groups of people in power and defending their interests and benefits. That is why it is not surprising that many facts of the past were presented exaggeratedly and distortedly, or even completely invented. HOWEVER THE GENERAL CANVAS STAYED CLOSE TO REALITY.

What really happened, only God knows. Partly, the participants of some historical event know this. History is being created before our eyes, and sometimes we cannot understand what is happening, why, in whose favor and by whom it is moving. For example, the story of the rise of Joseph the Beautiful in ancient Egypt was brought to us by God through the prophet Moses. There is no such story in the Egyptian chronicles and everything is written in a completely different way. Why? Because the Egyptians did not want to look bad in the eyes of other peoples and states. And what nation or government or church or group of people wants to look bad? That is why history has always been cleaned up and corrected by those who are interested in it. That is why those who believe in God and the Bible have one story, and those who do not believe in another, different from the biblical one. Most often, it is not the events themselves that are distorted, but their interpretation and motivation. Ultimately, everything is based on the faith and trust of some people (who did not live then and did not participate in the events described in historical books) to other persons, those who recorded these events and their explanation, as their participant or as a listener from the first persons of these events. The reliability of the record of events depends on the honesty of the persons who transmitted these events to the chronicler. In addition to the testimony of eyewitnesses and participants, additional historical sources are various documents, letters, memoirs, notes of various persons, coins, postage stamps, heraldry, weapons, household items, equipment, scientific works, architectural ensembles, temples, cathedrals, palaces, chambers and others. works of architecture, works of art, monuments, chronicles of wars, post-war treaties, later - photographs, audio and video recordings, newsreels and much more.

One of the modern historical myths is the version that Tsar Peter the Great, during his stay in Europe with the Great Embassy, ​​was kidnapped and another person similar to him was put in his place. The very idea of ​​this version and its technical implementation have a place to be. Something like this really could have happened, but it didn't. All the versions of “evidence” offered by the authors are very strained and can only matter to those people who really want to believe in this version. For a thoughtful and impartial view, a number of reasonable objections and questions arise.

So, for the time being, let's take on faith this version of the substitution of Tsar Peter the Great for his double and, based on this fact, we will pose a number of questions:

1. Who ordered this action and who needed it and why?
2. What is the motive for this crime?
3. Tsar Peter was not alone in the Great Embassy. There were many people with him who knew him well. If there was a substitution of the king, then how did these persons not notice this substitution? Or if they noticed, then why were they silent and this mystery waited until the 21st century?
4. In addition to the persons of the Great Embassy, ​​other persons in Russia also knew Tsar Peter. Why, when he (his double) returned to Russia, did they not raise this issue? Is it really such a mundane and unimportant matter to anyone that you can just ignore it? For example, the Old Believers went into schism and to the stake for smaller reasons. The version that False Peter allegedly managed to neutralize all the former environment of Tsar Peter the Great is incredible! The change of one and the same person, and striking, is a very real thing. This has happened and happens often. But it is impossible to explain any change in a person's behavior by replacing it with a double.
5. According to the version, False Peter was a foreigner (i.e. not Russian). Then it is not clear how he could instantly and imperceptibly for others enter into the atmosphere of Tsar Peter? After all, for him it is a foreign country, a foreign people, a foreign culture, foreign customs, etc. How did he navigate the Kremlin and Moscow, and even more so in the affairs of the Russian state? How could he, imperceptibly to the environment, use Peter's objects without giving himself away? How could people not notice the change in speech style, accent, and other features of the double's speech?
6. How could all the changes visible to others be kept in the strictest confidence? Suppose people from the environment of Tsar Peter were afraid of the death penalty and therefore were silent. But someone could let it slip before death, at confession, or after moving to another country. Such a secret is very difficult to keep without "leaks" and publicity. Moreover, the False Peter was alone, in a strange environment and had to constantly be afraid of being exposed. He could be blackmailed. He could be manipulated by those who found out that it was not Peter. But nothing of the sort happened.
7. As for the conduct of wars, Peter the Great has never been an outstanding commander. The courage shown by him in Azov is the ardor of youth, and not a manifestation of the genius of the commander. According to the version, the true Tsar Peter allegedly opposed the double and the impostor together with the Swedish king Charles 12. If this were true, then it is not clear why the main incentive and motive for this war - the imposture of False Peter and the authenticity of the true Tsar Peter - were not loudly voiced throughout Russia , all of Europe and the whole world? After all, even genuine impostors to the Russian throne - False Dmitry, Razin, Pugachev - used this motive! And how could the Russian tsar achieve his restoration to the throne with the help of foreign troops, by killing and bloodshed his subjects? This is complete absurdity!
8. What Peter the Great began to do after returning from Europe could only be done by a genuine Russian tsar, for no impostor would have been let down. The impostor would be secretly poisoned or stabbed to death in his sleep, and in the morning his imposture would be revealed!
8. It is known that Tsar Peter, with a large stature, had a small foot size for a man of this height (38). This is known from his shoes, descriptions, and the wax figure of Tsar Peter. It is impossible to fake it for another person, as well as to hide the size of the legs, especially its rare disproportionate combination with height.
10. In addition to secular persons, Tsar Peter was well known to representatives of the clergy of the Russian Church. They could not fail to notice the substitution of the king or keep silent about it. For example, I know each of my spiritual children and would immediately notice his substitution even for a very similar person. The spirit, the peculiarity of speech and behavior, and much more that cannot be described cannot be faked. Moreover, the Orthodox tsar, according to the version, stopped attending churches, services, fasting, etc.
11. If, out of fear, ordinary believers or priests would be silent, then the saints of God would not be silent in any way! According to the version, it turns out that there were no saints in Russia then, or that the Lord God did not reveal anything to them about the substitution of their king, or that they were afraid for their lives and therefore were hypocrites? Yes, this will not happen! Saint Mitrofan of Voronezh denounced Tsar Peter for the pagan statues on the royal palace in St. Petersburg and even prepared for execution for this. But the king summoned him, talked to him and let him go home. The Monk Seraphim of Sarov spoke of Tsar Peter as a Great Sovereign, but, even with this greatness of the Tsar, God refused him the transfer of the relics of the holy noble Prince Alexander Nevsky to Petersburg.

The tomb was made of silver, but there were no relics in it and no. According to the version, it turns out that all Russian saints were deceived and prayed not for the true Tsar Peter, but for a foreign impostor and enemy of Russia. We, faithful to Christ, cannot allow such a situation! The saints of God could not but know about the substitution (if it really existed) and even more treacherously keep silent about it!

This version paints a terrible picture of the state of the Russian people and the Russian kingdom. What kind of kingdom is this and what kind of people are these, if some foreigner could freely seize power and the royal throne by deceit, and fool them all his life, and after his death too! But since someone decided to promote this version to the masses of people, they needed to compose the story of "the true Tsar Peter the Great." Here is an attempt to return the Russian throne by a war with Russia on the side of Sweden, and facts that coincide with the facts from the feature film "Iron Mask", and other unproven fabrications. And, finally, it is enough to look at the results of the reign of the king with the names Peter the Great and Peter the Great. If, according to the version, the Russian throne was really seized by a foreign agent by deceit, then he should have pursued a policy of destroying the country and weakening its state and military power. We find the exact opposite of this! Let's say the church and faith somehow suffered because of Peter's reforms, but that state itself was transformed and became modern, with a strong army and navy. Why was it necessary for a foreign agent and his puppeteers? After all, under False Dmitry, who reigned in intrigues of the Poles in Moscow, Russia in one year came to a catastrophe and its death! And here science has advanced, and the education system has improved, and production has improved, and Russia has access to the seas, and the state has grown stronger, and it has won victories over foreign troops, and built a new capital, Petersburg, which still stands and surprises with its architecture . Why all this to foreign agents, masons and conspirators who only wanted the collapse of Russia? It was after Peter the Great that the enemies of Russia caught on and began to conspire and commit the murders of the tsars - Paul, Alexander II, Nicholas II, and also contributed to the acceleration of the death of Tsar Alexander III! And at the same time, economically and politically, Russia was developing and strengthening all the time, which was what was terrible for her enemies and ill-wishers. And where does serfdom, as well as vodka? Yes, they were bad things in Russia. But serfdom was nevertheless abolished and abolished, and they fought against drunkenness. But the Grand Duke Vladimir of Kyiv wrote about the love of drinking in Russia. Peter brought not drunkenness, but alcohol trade, economically beneficial to his court and state. And Lomonosov invented vodka, not Tsar Peter. But the passion for drinking alcohol is a sinful passion inspired by demons, not by people. People can only seduce her and give a reason.

Summing up, we can confidently say that we do not have any serious grounds and evidence for accepting this version. Everything is built on assumptions and assumptions with the help of fitted comparisons of different qualities of the same person. Doubles in history were and are. They were and are being used by the powers that be, but not enough to give them their power. The strong are always insured and hold their doubles in such a way that none of us would like to be in their place. No matter how much anyone likes Tsar Peter the Great, no matter what mistakes he makes, but it was he and he also made them.

Why did they let this supposedly “patriotic” version go for a walk? In fact, this version does not solve the issues of history, does not explain the truly past events and does not restore the gaps in history, but harms the Russian people and the Russian world in general. By allowing such a substitution, the Russian people are placed in a very humiliating and unfavorable position. Solid soil is knocked out of the ground, albeit a combed, but still true story, and in return they are presented with the unsteady sand of conjectures and guesswork, or even intentionally false inventions. This brings confusion into the soul of a person (and any confusion, according to the teaching of the fathers of the Church of Christ, comes from demons), temptation, distrust of anyone, despondency and despair. Hence the fragility of views and the complex of the constant fear of being deceived, skepticism, distrust, chaos and loss. And who needs it? Enemies of salvation!

Associated with the life and death of the great Russians. This includes the death of the son of Ivan the Terrible, Tsarevich Dimitri, and the execution of the last Russian Emperor Nicholas II, and the poisoning of I.V. Stalin. At the same time, the substitution of Peter I - is it a fiction or a historical fact, has been repeatedly discussed by historians and has three different options.

The main versions of the substitution of Peter I

The least conspiratorial hypothesis that Tsar Peter I was replaced by a double was put forward by V. Kukovenko, co-founder of the historical society of the city of Mozhaisk, and I. Danilov, head of the Philosophical Assault project. According to them, during the second amusing "Semenovsky" campaign in 1691, the young tsar was mortally wounded during a horse attack or a skirmish. A similar accident has happened before. A year earlier, during an exercise, a grenade exploded in the hands of a soldier, burning the face of Peter I himself and his ally, General Patrick Gordon. Peter's associates, led by the boyar Fyodor Romodanovsky, had previously noted an undoubted resemblance to the tsar by the Dutch shipbuilder Yaan Mush, a Saardam carpenter who arrived in Russia to build an amusing fleet. F. Romodanovsky and the commander of the opposing amusing army "Generalissimo" I. Buturlin, saving themselves from the death penalty, and their relatives from repression, replaced Peter I with a Dutch master who was 4 ... 5 years younger than the tsar.

The most convincing and substantiated is the hypothesis proposed by the “subverters” of the modern view of historical science and the developers of the New Chronology, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences A.T. Fomenko and associate professor of Moscow State University G.V. Nosovsky. They were the first to note that the official date of Peter's birth did not correspond to the day of his angel. If the king, indeed, was born on May 30, 1672, then he should have been named Isakiy. It was in honor of this name, the real name of the person who replaced the king, that the main church cathedral of the Russian Empire was named. At the same time, the fact that Russia, starting from 1698 - the year of the return of Peter I from the Great Embassy - was ruled by an impostor, was hinted in a veiled form by the historian P. Milyukov, who wrote an article about the first Russian Emperor for the encyclopedia of Brockhaus and Efron.

The following facts support this hypothesis:

• the tsar sent his wife, tsarina Evdokia, who gave birth to his son Alexei, to a monastery during his travels in Europe before returning to Russia;
• before the entry of Peter I into Moscow, the remnants of the streltsy army were destroyed, and the streltsy died near Moscow during the battle with an unknown army, under the command of the boyar Shein, about whom no more historical records have been preserved;
• before entering Moscow, the Russian autocrat secretly meets with the Polish king and pays him a “contribution” (according to other sources, a “subsidy”) of 1.5 million gold efimki, which was equal to the annual income of the Muscovite state;
• returning to Moscow, Peter unsuccessfully tried to find Sophia Paleolog's library, the location of which was known only to persons of royal blood and which Princess Sophia repeatedly visited;
• shaving of beards, Western European dancing and entertainment, and the introduction of Western customs began only after the return of the sovereign from the Grand Embassy.

There are two versions of the substitution of Peter I with a double during a trip to Western Europe:

• St. Petersburg mathematician Sergei Albertovich Sall believes that the double of the Tsar of Muscovy was a prominent freemason and relative of William of Orange, the first king of England and Scotland and the only representative on the British throne from the Nassau-Oran dynasty;
• according to the historian Yevgeny Trofimovich Bayda, the double was either a Swede or a Dane named Isaac (hence St. Isaac's Cathedral) and professed the Lutheran religion.

However, to check the versions about whether the substitution of Peter was a fiction or a historical fact, this event can be resolved quite simply. To do this, it is necessary to take, during the next, planned restoration of the tomb of Peter in the Peter and Paul Cathedral, a particle of genetic material, and it will immediately become clear, substitutions, as well as theories about who was the father of the first Russian Emperor - Tsar Alexei Fedorovich or Patriarch Nikon, about whose connections with Peter's mother, Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina, were slandered by contemporaries.

Peter I and the whole truth about substitution!

(photo difference 2 years)
Studying historical facts and events that were carefully hushed up and kept secret, one can definitely say that Peter I on the throne was replaced by an impostor. The substitution of the real Peter I and his capture took place during his trip to Amsterdam along with the Great Embassy. I tried, by copying, to put together in this post various sources confirming this tragic fact in the history of Russia.

The embassy is leaving a young man of twenty-six years of age, above average height, solid build, physically healthy, with a mole on his left cheek, with wavy hair, well-educated, loving everything Russian, Orthodox (it would be more correct - orthodox) Christian, who knows the Bible by heart and etc. etc.

Two years later, a man returns who practically does not speak Russian, who hates everything Russian, who until the end of his life never learned to write in Russian, having forgotten everything he could before leaving for the Grand Embassy and miraculously acquired new skills and abilities, without a mole on on the left cheek, with straight hair, a sickly, forty-year-old looking man.

Isn't it true, some unexpected changes happened to the young man during his two years of absence.

Curiously, the papers of the Great Embassy do not mention that Mikhailov (under this surname young Peter went with the embassy) fell ill with a fever, but it was no secret for the embassy who, in fact, “Mikhailov” was.

A man returns from a trip with a chronic fever, with traces of long-term use of mercury preparations, which were then used to treat tropical fever.

For reference, it should be noted that the Grand Embassy went by the northern sea route, while tropical fever can be “earned” in southern waters, and even then, only after visiting the jungle.

In addition, after returning from the Great Embassy, ​​Peter I, during naval battles, demonstrated extensive experience in boarding combat, which has specific features that can only be mastered by experience. Which requires personal participation in many boarding battles.

All this together suggests that the person who returned with the Great Embassy was an experienced sailor who participated in many naval battles and sailed a lot in the southern seas.

Before the trip, Peter I did not take part in naval battles, if only because during his childhood and youth, Muscovy or Moscow Tartaria did not have access to the seas, with the exception of the White Sea, which simply cannot be called tropical. Yes, and on this Peter I was not often, and even then, as an honorary passenger.

During his visit to the Solovetsky Monastery, the boat on which he was miraculously saved during a storm, and he personally makes a memorial cross for the Archangel Cathedral, on the occasion of salvation in a storm.

And if we add to this the fact that he often corresponded with his beloved wife (Tsarina Evdokia), whom he missed, when he was away, upon his return from the Great Embassy, ​​without even seeing her, without explaining the reasons, he sends him to a convent .

In the work of D.S. Merezhkovsky "Antichrist", the author noted a complete change in the appearance, character and psyche of Tsar Peter I after his return from the "German lands", where he went for two weeks, and returned two years later.

The Russian embassy that accompanied the tsar consisted of 20 people, and was headed by A.D. Menshikov. After returning to Russia, this embassy consisted of only the Dutch (including the notorious Lefort), only Menshikov remained the only one from the old composition.

This "embassy" brought a completely different tsar, who spoke Russian poorly, did not recognize his friends and relatives, which immediately betrayed a substitution: This forced Tsarina Sophia, the sister of the real Tsar Peter I, to raise archers against the impostor. As you know, the Streltsy rebellion was brutally suppressed, Sophia was hanged on the Spassky Gates of the Kremlin, the impostor exiled the wife of Peter I to a monastery, where she never reached, and called his own from Holland.

“His” brother Ivan V and “his” little children Alexander, Natalya and Lavrenty False Peter immediately killed, although the official story tells us about this in a completely different way. And he executed the youngest son Alexei as soon as he tried to free his real father from the Bastille.

=======================

Peter the impostor did such transformations with Russia that we are still echoing around. He began to act like an ordinary conqueror:

He defeated the Russian self-government - "zemstvo" and replaced it with the bureaucratic apparatus of foreigners who brought theft, debauchery and drunkenness to Russia and vigorously planted it here;

He transferred the peasants to the property of the nobles, which turned them into slaves (to whiten the image of the impostor, this “event” falls on Ivan IV);

He defeated the merchants and began to plant industrialists, which led to the destruction of the former universality of people;

He defeated the clergy - the carriers of Russian culture and destroyed Orthodoxy, bringing it closer to Catholicism, which inevitably gave rise to atheism;

Introduced smoking, drinking alcohol and coffee;

He destroyed the ancient Russian calendar, rejuvenating our civilization by 5503 years;

He ordered all Russian chronicles to be brought to Petersburg, and then, like Filaret, he ordered them to be burned. He called on the German "professors" to write a completely different Russian history;

Under the guise of a struggle with the old faith, he destroyed all the elders who lived for more than three hundred years;

He forbade the cultivation of amaranth and the use of amaranth bread, which was the main food of the Russian people, which destroyed the longevity on Earth, which then remained in Russia;

He abolished natural measures: a fathom, a finger, an elbow, an inch, which were present in clothes, utensils and architecture, making them fixed in the Western manner. This led to the destruction of ancient Russian architecture and art, to the disappearance of the beauty of everyday life. As a result, people ceased to be beautiful, since divine and vital proportions disappeared in their structure;

He replaced the Russian title system with the European one, which turned the peasants into an estate. Although the "peasant" is a title, higher than the king, about which there is more than one evidence;

Destroyed the Russian script, which consisted of 151 characters, and introduced 43 characters of the Cyril and Methodius script;

He disarmed the Russian army, exterminating the archers as a caste with their miraculous abilities and magical weapons, and introduced primitive firearms and stabbing weapons in a European manner, dressing the army first in French and then in German uniforms, although the Russian military uniform was the weapon itself. Among the people, the new regiments were called "amusing".

But his main crime is the destruction of Russian education (image + sculpture), the essence of which was to create in a person three subtle bodies that he does not receive from birth, and if they are not formed, then the consciousness will not have a connection with the consciousnesses of past lives. If in Russian educational institutions a generalist was made from a person who could, starting from bast shoes and ending with a spaceship, do everything himself, then Peter introduced a specialization that made him dependent on others.

Before Peter the Pretender, people in Russia did not know what wine was, he ordered barrels of wine to be rolled out onto the square and the townspeople to drink for free. This was done to ward off the memory of a past life. During the period of Peter, the persecution of babies who were born, remembering their past lives and able to speak, continued. Their persecution began with John IV. The mass destruction of infants with past life memories cast a curse on all incarnations of such children. It is no coincidence that today, when a talking child is born, he lives no more than two hours.

After all these deeds, the invaders themselves did not dare to call Peter the Great for a long time. And only in the 19th century, when the horrors of Peter the Great had already been forgotten, did a version arose about Peter the innovator, who did so much useful for Russia, even brought potatoes and tomatoes from Europe, allegedly brought there from America. Solanaceae (potatoes, tomatoes) were widely represented in Europe even before Peter. Their endemic and very ancient presence on this continent is confirmed by a large species diversity, which took more than one thousand years. On the contrary, it is known that it was during the time of Peter that a campaign was launched against witchcraft, in other words, food culture (today the word "witchcraft" is used in a sharply negative sense). Before Peter there were 108 types of nuts, 108 types of vegetables, 108 types of fruits, 108 types of berries, 108 types of root nodules, 108 types of cereals, 108 spices and 108 types of fruits *, corresponding to 108 - Russian gods.

After Peter, there were units of sacred species used for food, which a person can see for himself. In Europe, this was done even earlier. Cereals, fruits and nodules were especially destroyed, since they were associated with the reincarnation of a person. The only thing that Peter the impostor did was allowed to cultivate potatoes (Orthodox Old Believers do not use them for food), sweet potato and earthen pear, which today are poorly eaten. The destruction of sacred plants consumed at a certain time led to the loss of complex divine reactions of the body (remember the Russian proverb “every vegetable has its own time”). Moreover, the mixing of food caused putrefactive processes in the body, and now people exude stench instead of fragrance. Adoptogenic plants have almost disappeared, only weakly active ones remain: the “root of life”, lemongrass, zamaniha, golden root. They contributed to the adaptation of a person to difficult conditions and kept a person young and healthy. There are absolutely no metamorphizing plants left that contribute to various metamorphoses of the body and appearance, about 20 years ago, the “Sacred Coil” was found in the mountains of Tibet, and even that has disappeared today.

* Today, the word “fruit” is understood as a unifying concept, which includes fruits, nuts, berries, which used to be called simply gifts, while gifts of herbs and shrubs were called fruits. An example of fruits are peas, beans (pods), peppers, i.e. peculiar unsweetened fruits of herbs.

The campaign to impoverish our diet continues and at present, Kalega and sorghum have almost disappeared from consumption, it is forbidden to grow poppies. From many sacred gifts, only the names remain, which are given to us today as synonyms for famous fruits. For example: pruhva, kaliva, bukhma, landushka, which are passed off as rutabaga, or armud, kvit, pigwa, gutey, gun - disappeared gifts that are passed off as quince. Kukish and dulya in the 19th century denoted a pear, although these were completely different gifts, today these words are used to call the image of a fig (also, by the way, a gift). A fist with an inserted thumb, used to denote the mudra of the heart, today it is used as a negative sign. Dulya, figs and figs were no longer grown, because they were sacred plants among the Khazars and Varangians. Already recently, proska has been called “millet”, barley - barley, and millet and barley cereals have disappeared forever from the humankind of agriculture.

What happened to the real Peter I? He was captured by the Jesuits and placed in a Swedish fortress. He managed to convey the letter to Charles XII, King of Sweden, and he rescued him from captivity. Together they organized a campaign against the impostor, but the entire Jesuit-Masonic fraternity of Europe, called to fight, together with the Russian troops (whose relatives were taken hostage in case the troops decide to go over to the side of Charles), won at Poltava. The real Russian Tsar Peter I was again captured and placed away from Russia - in the Bastille, where he later died. An iron mask was put on his face, which caused a lot of talk in France and Europe. The Swedish king Charles XII fled to Turkey, from where he tried again to organize a campaign against the impostor.

It would seem, kill the real Peter, and there would be no trouble. But the fact of the matter is, the invaders of the Earth needed a conflict, and without a living king behind bars, neither the Russian-Swedish war nor the Russian-Turkish war would have succeeded, which in fact were civil wars that led to the formation of two new states : Turkey and Sweden, and then a few more. But the real intrigue was not only in the creation of new states. In the 18th century, all of Russia knew and talked about the fact that Peter I was not a real tsar, but an impostor. And against this background, the “great Russian historians” who arrived from the German lands: Miller, Bayer, Schlozer and Kuhn, who completely distorted the history of Russia, no longer presented any difficulty in declaring all the Dmitriev tsars as False Dmitrys and impostors who did not have the right to the throne, and who did not managed to groan, they changed the royal surname to - Rurik.

The genius of Satanism is Roman law, which is the basis of the constitutions of modern states. It was created contrary to all ancient canons and ideas about a society based on self-government (autocracy).

For the first time, judicial power was transferred from the hands of the priests to the hands of people who did not have a spiritual dignity, i.e. the power of the best was replaced by the power of anyone.

Roman law is presented to us as the “crown” of human achievement, in reality it is the pinnacle of disorder and irresponsibility. State laws under Roman law are based on prohibitions and punishments, i.e. on negative emotions, which, as you know, can only destroy. This leads to a general lack of interest in the implementation of laws and to opposition of officials to the people. Even in the circus, work with animals is built not only on a whip, but also on a carrot, but a person on our planet is rated lower than animals by conquerors.

In contrast to Roman law, the Russian state was built not on prohibitive laws, but on the conscience of citizens, which strikes a balance between encouragement and prohibition. Let us recall how the Byzantine historian Procopius of Caesarea wrote about the Slavs: "They had all the laws in their heads." Relations in ancient society were regulated by the principles of horse, from which the words “canon” (ancient - konon), “from time immemorial”, “chambers” (i.e. according to horse) have come down to us. Guided by the principles of the horse, a person avoided mistakes and could incarnate again in this life. The principle is always above the law, because it contains more possibilities than the law, just as a sentence contains more information than one word. The very word "law" means "beyond the horse." If a society lives according to the principles of the horse, and not according to the laws, it is more vital. Commandments contain more than a horse, and therefore surpass it, just as a story contains more than a sentence. The commandments can improve human organization and thinking, which in turn can improve the principles of the horse.

As the remarkable Russian thinker I.L. Solonevich, who knew from his own experience the charms of Western democracy, in addition to the long-lived Russian monarchy, based on popular representation (zemstvo), merchants and clergy (meaning pre-Petrine times), democracy and dictatorship were invented, replacing each other in 20-30 years. However, let us give him the floor himself: “Professor Whipper is not entirely right when he writes that the modern humanities are only “theological scholasticism and nothing more”; it is something much worse: it is deceit. This is a whole collection of deceptive travel signals, beckoning us to the mass graves of famine and executions, typhus and wars, internal ruin and external destruction.

The “science” of Diderot, Rousseau, D’Alembert and others has already completed its cycle: there was famine, there was terror, there were wars, and there was the external defeat of France in 1814, in 1871, in 1940. The science of Hegel, Mommsen, Nietzsche and Rosenberg also ended its cycle: there was terror, there were wars, there was famine and there was defeat in 1918 and 1945. The science of the Chernyshevskys, Lavrovs, Mikhailovskys, Milyukovs and Lenins has not yet gone through the whole cycle: there is hunger, there is terror, there were wars, both internal and external, but the defeat will still come: inevitable and inevitable, one more payment for the verbiage of two hundred years, for swamp lights lit by our masters of thoughts over the most rotten places of a real historical swamp.

Not always the philosophers listed by Solonevich themselves came up with ideas that could destroy society: they were often prompted to them.

V.A. Shemshuk "Return of Paradise to Earth"
======================

“With other European peoples, you can achieve the goal in humane ways, but not so with the Russians ... I am not dealing with people, but with animals that I want to turn into people” - such a documented phrase of Peter 1 very clearly conveys his attitude towards the Russian people.

It is hard to believe that these same "animals", in gratitude for this, called him the Great.
Russophobes will immediately try to explain everything by the fact that yes, he made people out of animals, and only because of this Russia became Great and the “animals” that became people thankfully called him the Great.
Or maybe this is the gratitude of the owners of the Romanovs for the perfectly fulfilled obligations to destroy precisely the traces of the greatness of the Russian People, which haunted those who wanted to create a Great History for themselves, the ruling circles of the states, until recently the former provincial outlying provinces?
And it was this very Greatness of the Russian People that did not allow them to create it?

========================================

One can talk a lot and interestingly about Peter I. For example, today it is already known that his short but intense reign actually cost the Russian people more than 20 million lives (read the article by N.V. Levashov “Visible and invisible genocide” about this). Maybe that's why the man who is called today Peter I is now declared "great"?

Anyone interested in this topic can also watch the video:

The film "Peter and Peter" is just a few answers to hundreds of questions about the real deeds of the one who today is called "the great" Peter. This is an attempt to raise the most necessary questions and search for truthful answers to them, and not the stupidity and obvious lies that our historians and politicians give. The film is based on the materials of Academician N.V. Levashova, E.T. Byda and some other authors...

VKontakte Facebook Odnoklassniki

One of the reasons that led to the emergence of the version about the substitution of Tsar Peter I was the research of A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky

The beginning of these studies were the findings made during the study of an exact copy of the throne of Ivan the Terrible. In those days, the zodiac signs of the current rulers were placed on the thrones. Thanks to the study of the signs placed on the throne of Ivan the Terrible, scientists have found that the actual date of his birth differs from the official version by four years.

Scientists compiled a table of the names of Russian tsars and their birthdays, and thanks to this table, it was revealed that the official birthday of Peter I does not coincide with the day of his angel, which is a blatant contradiction compared to all the names of Russian tsars. After all, names in Russia at baptism were given exclusively according to the holy calendar, and the name given to Peter breaks the established centuries-old tradition, which in itself does not fit into the framework and laws of that time.

Photo by Stan Shebs from wikimedia.org

A. Fomenko and G. Nosovsky, on the basis of the table, found out that the real name, which falls on the official date of birth of Peter I, is Isakiy. This explains the name of the main cathedral of tsarist Russia. So, in the dictionary of Brockhaus and Efron it says: “St. Isaac's Cathedral is the main temple in St. Petersburg, dedicated to the name of St. Isaac of Dalmatia, whose memory is honored on May 30, the birthday of Peter the Great.

Image from lib.rus.ec

Let's consider the following obvious historical facts. Their totality shows a fairly clear picture of the substitution of the real Peter I for a foreigner:

1. An Orthodox ruler was leaving Russia for Europe, wearing traditional Russian clothes. Two surviving portraits of the king of that time depict Peter I in a traditional caftan. The tsar wore a caftan even during his stay at the shipyards, which confirms his adherence to traditional Russian customs. After the end of his stay in Europe, a man returned to Russia wearing exclusively European-style clothes, and in the future, the new Peter I never put on Russian clothes, including an attribute obligatory for the tsar - royal vestments. This fact is difficult to explain with the official version of a sudden change in lifestyle and the beginning of adherence to the European canons of development.

2. There are quite weighty grounds for doubting the difference in the structure of the body of Peter I and the impostor. According to accurate data, the growth of the impostor Peter I was 204 cm, while the real king was shorter and denser. It should be noted that the height of his father, Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov, was 170 cm, and his grandfather, Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, was also of average height. The difference in height of 34 cm is very much out of the general picture of true kinship, especially since in those days people over two meters tall were considered an extremely rare occurrence. Indeed, even in the middle of the 19th century, the average height of Europeans was 167 cm, and the average height of Russian recruits at the beginning of the 18th century was 165 cm, which fits into the general anthropometric picture of that time. The difference in height between the real king and the false Peter also explains the refusal to wear royal clothes: they simply did not fit the size of the newly appeared impostor.

3. The portrait of Peter I by Godfried Kneller, which was created during the Tsar's stay in Europe, clearly shows a distinct mole. In later portraits, the mole is absent. It is difficult to explain this by the inaccurate works of portrait painters of that time: after all, the portraiture of those years was distinguished by the highest level of realism.

4. Returning after a long trip to Europe, the newly-minted tsar did not know about the location of the richest library of Ivan the Terrible, although the secret of finding the library was passed from tsar to tsar. So, Princess Sophia knew where the library was and visited it, and the new Peter repeatedly made attempts to find the library and did not even disdain excavations: after all, the library of Ivan the Terrible kept the rarest publications that could shed light on many secrets of history.

5. An interesting fact is the composition of the Russian embassy that went to Europe. The number of those accompanying the king was 20 people, while the embassy was headed by A. Menshikov. And the returned embassy consisted, with the exception of Menshikov, only of the subjects of Holland. Moreover, the duration of the trip has increased many times over. The embassy, ​​together with the king, went to Europe for two weeks, and returned only after two years of stay.

6. Returning from Europe, the new king did not meet either with relatives or with his inner circle. And subsequently, in a short time, he got rid of his closest relatives in various ways.

7. Sagittarius - the guards and the elite of the tsarist army - suspected something was wrong and did not recognize the impostor. The streltsy rebellion that had begun was brutally suppressed by Peter. But the archers were the most advanced and combat-ready military formations that faithfully served the Russian tsars. Sagittarius became by inheritance, which indicates the highest level of these units.

Image from swordmaster.org

It is characteristic that the scale of the destruction of archers was more global than according to official sources. At that time, the number of archers reached 20,000 people, and after the pacification of the streltsy rebellion, the Russian army was left without infantry, after which a new set of recruits was made and the army was completely reorganized. A noteworthy fact is that in honor of the suppression of the Streltsy rebellion, a commemorative medal was issued with inscriptions in Latin, which had never been used before when minting coins and medals in Russia.

Image from oboudnoda.org

8. Imprisonment of the lawful wife of Evdokia Lopukhina in a monastery, which the tsar did in absentia, while in the Great Embassy in London. Moreover, after the death of Peter, Lopukhina, by order of Catherine I, was transferred to the Shlisselburg fortress, which was famous for its harsh conditions of detention. Subsequently, Peter will marry Martha Samuilovna Skavronskaya-Kruse, who comes from the lower classes, who after his death will become Empress Catherine I.

Image from wikimedia.org

Now let's consider what the greatest steps were made by the newly-minted tsar for Russia.

All official versions claim that Peter I was the greatest reformer who laid the foundations for the formation of the most powerful Russian Empire. In fact, the main activity of the impostor was to destroy the foundations of the former statehood and the spirituality of the people. Among the most famous great "deeds" of Peter there are both well-known and little-known facts that testify to the true appearance and reforms of the new king.

- Introduction of the Russian form of slavery- serfdom, which completely restricts the rights of peasants both in the old and in the conquered lands. In one form or another, the consolidation of peasants has existed since the 15th century, but Peter I carried out a tough reform in relation to the peasants, completely depriving them of their rights. A remarkable fact is the fact that neither in the Russian North nor in Siberia serfdom was widespread.

- Carrying out tax reform with the introduction of the most severe tax system. In parallel, the replacement of small silver money for copper began to be carried out. Having created the Ingrian Chancellery, headed by Menshikov, Peter introduced ruinous taxes, which included taxes on private fishing, wearing a beard, baths. Moreover, adherents of the old rites were subject to a double tax, which served as an additional incentive for the resettlement of the Old Believers in the most remote places in Siberia.

- Introduction in Russia of a new system of chronology, which put an end to the countdown "from the creation of the world." This innovation had a strong negative impact and became an additional incentive for the gradual eradication of the original Old Believer faith.

- Transfer of the capital from Moscow to the built St. Petersburg. The mention of Moscow as an ancient sacred place is found in many sources, including Daniil Andreev in his work "Rose of the World". The change of the capital also served to weaken spirituality and reduce the role of the merchants in Russia.

The destruction of ancient Russian chronicles and the beginning of rewriting the history of Russia with the help of German professors. This activity has acquired a truly gigantic scale, which explains the minimum number of surviving historical documents.

- Rejection of Russian writing, which consisted of 151 characters, and the introduction of the new alphabet of Cyril and Methodius, which consisted of 43 characters. With this, Peter dealt a severe blow to the traditions of the people and cut off access to ancient written sources.

- Cancellation of Russian measures of measurement, such as sazhen, elbow, vershok, which subsequently caused the strongest changes in traditional Russian architecture and art.

- Reducing the influence of the merchants and the development of the industrial class, who was given gigantic powers, up to creating their own pocket armies.

- The most brutal military expansion into Siberia, which became the forerunner of the final destruction of the Great Tartaria. In parallel, a new religion was planted on the conquered lands, and the lands were heavily taxed. The peak of the looting of Siberian burials, the destruction of holy places and local clergy also falls on the time of Peter. It was during the reign of Peter the Great that numerous detachments of bugrovers appeared in Western Siberia, who, in search of gold and silver, opened up old burial places and plundered holy and sacred places. Many of the most valuable "finds" made up the famous collection of Scythian gold of Peter I.

- Destruction of the system of Russian self-government- zemstvos and the transition to a bureaucratic system, which, as a rule, was headed by hirelings from Western Europe.

- The most severe repressions against the Russian clergy, the actual destruction of Orthodoxy. The scale of repression against the clergy was global. One of the most significant punishers of Peter was his close associate Yakov Bruce, who became famous for punitive expeditions to Old Believer sketes and the destruction of old church books and property.

- The widespread distribution of narcotic drugs in Russia that cause rapid and persistent addiction - alcohol, coffee and tobacco.

- A complete ban on the cultivation of amaranth from which both butter and bread were made. This plant contributes not only to improving human health, but also prolongs life by 20-30%.

- The introduction of the system of provinces and the strengthening of the punitive role of the army. Often the right to collect taxes was given directly into the hands of the generals. And each province was obliged to maintain separate military units.

- The actual ruin of the population. So, A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky indicate that according to the 1678 census, 791,000 households were subject to taxation. And the general census conducted in 1710 showed only 637,000 households, and this despite the rather large number of lands subordinated to Russia during this period. Characteristically, but this only affected the strengthening of tax taxes. So, in the provinces, where the number of households decreased, taxes were levied according to the data of the old census, which led to the actual plunder and destruction of the population.

- Peter I also distinguished himself by his atrocities in Ukraine. So, in 1708, the hetman's capital, the city of Baturyn, was completely plundered and destroyed. More than 14,000 people out of the city's 20,000 population were killed in the massacre. At the same time, Baturin was almost completely destroyed and burned, and 40 churches and monasteries were looted and desecrated.

Contrary to popular belief, Peter I was by no means a great military leader: de facto, he did not win a single significant war. The only "successful" campaign can only be considered the Northern War, which was rather sluggish and lasted for 21 years. This war caused irreparable damage to the financial system of Russia and led to the actual impoverishment of the population.

One way or another, all the atrocities of Peter, called in the official versions of history "reformist activities", were aimed at the complete eradication of both the culture and faith of the Russian people, and the culture and religion of the peoples living in the annexed territories. In fact, the newly-minted tsar caused irreparable damage to Russia, completely changing its culture, way of life and customs.